The Shameless Supreme Court is Responsible for the Assassination Attempt on Trump's Life

            Former Speaker of the House John Boehner, in his book On the House, reveals that there were serious feelers during the 1996 presidential campaign for Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia to run for Vice-President with Senator Bob Dole. There is no law or provision in the Constitution prohibiting Supreme Court Justices from running for political office, but it would be a violation of the entire system of checks and balances on which the United States' government is based. Once a Supreme Court appointment, ostensibly for life, was seen as a stepping stone to national elective office, its members and decisions would be scrutinized for their political implications.

            Had Justice Scalia's flirtation with higher office been public knowledge at the time, both the controversial 5-4 Bush v. Gore decision stopping the vote count in Florida and the 5-4 District of Columbia v. Heller decision that Scalia wrote, which found an individual right to have guns in the Constitution would have been seen as the political decisions that they are. This is one reason for the extreme partisanship. When unelected bodies with lifetime tenure make political decisions, people become frustrated because they have no peaceful way to change the policy of the government.

            When the Second Amendment was ratified on December 15, 1791, every gun in America was handmade. They weighed about 10 pounds and had to be reloaded after each shot. An expert marksman could fire only four rounds per minute. An AR-15, the gun that shot former President Trump can fire 45 rounds per minute, or 400 per minute with a bump stock.

             When the Second Amendment was ratified, the guns had an effective range of 100 yards and were dangerous to the shooter. The AR-15 has an effective range of 500-600 yards, with a maximum range of 2,500 yards to 3,000 yards (a mile and a half). Tom Crooks was 200 yards to 300 yards away from Trump when he nicked the president's ear, killed a fireman, and wounded two others after firing eight bullets. It is probably only because Crooks was a terrible shot and luck that spared Trump's life. The sharpshooters accompanying Trump killed Crooks in three seconds, probably saving scores of lives including the president's.

            What does the Supreme Court say about the difference between colonial-era weapons and contemporary firearms?  "The Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding." This statement is absurd on its face. It says that the founders extended protections to weapons it knows nothing about. Secondly, bearable arms aren't mentioned in the Constitution, it is a wholly new idea created by the Supreme Court by rearranging and misinterpreting the text of the Second Amendment. For a full analysis of why the Second Amendment requires the Regulation of Automatic Weapons see: ..\2022\second amendment.htm

and How the Supreme Court has turned the Constitution into a Religious Document

..\2023\The Supreme Court has turned the Constitution into a Religious Text.htm

Return to Institute of Election Analysis Home Page

Contact: Joshua Leinsdorf